A serious archive
for an extraordinary
decade.
“The phenomenon is real. The cover-up is real. The disclosure is happening — and the public record has never been better.”
DisclosureUFO is an independent archive of public-record UFO and UAP incidents, witness testimony, primary documents, and original AI-composed music — assembled in one place, indexed, sourced, and built for serious readers.
We do not lobby. We do not speculate beyond the evidence. We don’t need to. The on-record material — congressional hearings, FOIA releases, sworn affidavits, multi-witness encounters — is itself extraordinary. We catalogue it.
Public record only.
Every case in this archive is built from sources that exist in the public record — court testimony, FOIA releases, peer-reviewed journals, declassified documents, on-record witness statements. No anonymous Twitter threads. No speculation as fact.
The witnesses are the work.
We don't ask you to take our word for it. We point you at theirs. Brazel's affidavit. Halt's memo. Fravor's testimony. The children of Ariel. Read the source. Make your own call.
Tier system, not a verdict.
Tier A means the case is heavily corroborated and on the record at official levels. Tier B means substantial witnesses or documents. Tier C means real but contested. We classify rigour, not truth.
Beautiful is non-negotiable.
A serious archive deserves a serious interface. Cinematic typography, real data, real coordinates, real coordinates per file. The phenomenon has been served by 2003-era forums for too long.
Who’s
behind this.
“[pull-quote from founder — one sentence on why this archive had to exist now, in this decade, in this form].”
[founder name] — [former role / title]. [One or two sentences on background: journalism, research, technology, policy — whatever’s relevant]. Based in [city].
[Founder bio, paragraph two: what drew you to the phenomenon, what qualifies you to curate it, and what you’re explicitly not claiming. Keep it short, keep it honest. The archive is the work; this is a footnote.]
Editorial contributions, fact-checking, design, and case research are credited per file where applicable.
We classify rigour,
not truth.
Every case in the archive carries a tier. The tier reflects how heavily corroborated the case is — how many witnesses, how much documentation, what the official response was, what physical evidence exists. It does not tell you what happened. It tells you how confident the public record is.
Government documents, multiple independent witnesses, official channels engaged (congressional record, FOIA returns, declassified files). Roswell debris, Tic-Tac, Phoenix Lights, the 2023 Pentagon hearings.
Multiple sources, sworn witness statements, news-of-record coverage. May lack direct government acknowledgment but the documentation is solid. Pascagoula, Westall, Falcon Lake.
Single-witness or low-corroboration cases that nonetheless cleared a credibility floor — named witnesses, on-record statements, primary documents. Contested by skeptics and we say so.
What we score, in order.
- 01
Witness count.
How many independent observers? Solo, small-group, or mass-witness? Are they named and on-record, or anonymous?
- 02
Documentation depth.
Sworn affidavits. Contemporaneous reports. Photographic, radar, or instrumented data. Court testimony. The paper trail.
- 03
Government response.
Did an official body investigate, deny, classify, or acknowledge? Project Blue Book file? FOIA release? Congressional record?
- 04
Physical evidence.
Trace material, debris, soil samples, residue, medical findings. Provenance and chain of custody where they exist.
- 05
Independent corroboration.
Do unrelated witnesses, separate agencies, or outside researchers confirm key elements? Or does the case rest on a single source?
The archive stands on other shoulders.
DisclosureUFO is built on decades of work by journalists, researchers, archivists, and witnesses who refused to let the record disappear. Below is a partial list. Every case file credits its specific sources.
- Eyes on CinemaYouTube archive of historical UFO interviews and broadcast footage
- UFO Archives ProjectCurated witness-interview reels and press-conference reels
- Dr. John E. MackPulitzer-winning Harvard psychiatrist, abduction research
- J. Allen HynekProject Blue Book scientific consultant, classification frameworks
- Jacques ValléeComputer scientist, comparative case analysis
- MUFONMutual UFO Network case database
- NICAPNational Investigations Committee on Aerial Phenomena records
- CUFOSCenter for UFO Studies historical files
- The FOIA ProjectDeclassified federal document archive
- Project Blue Book FilesUS Air Force investigation records, 1947-1969
- Congressional RecordUAP hearings and testimony, 2022 – present
- Black VaultJohn Greenewald Jr.’s long-running FOIA archive
- Leslie KeanNYT UAP reporting, 2017 onward
- Ralph BlumenthalNYT UAP reporting, 2017 onward
- Ross CoulthartLong-form investigative reporting
- George KnappDecades of regional and national reporting
- The named affiantsBrazel. Halt. Fravor. Graves. Grusch. The Ariel children. The Hills. Walton. Hundreds more.